<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINQ to SQL In Disconnected/N-Tier scenarios: Saving an Object</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One WCF Service to Rule them All? (SOAP w https, oData, JSON, POX, etc&#8230;) &#124; DeveloperQuestion.com</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>One WCF Service to Rule them All? (SOAP w https, oData, JSON, POX, etc&#8230;) &#124; DeveloperQuestion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>[...] http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/" rel="nofollow">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamal</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>hi again ,
can i use datetime type of sql server and not timestamp type . i already have update_On field of type datetime , in my data model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi again ,<br />
can i use datetime type of sql server and not timestamp type . i already have update_On field of type datetime , in my data model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamal</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-4963</link>
		<dc:creator>jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-4963</guid>
		<description>hi ,
as jon said 
"The biggest challenge is dealing with entities that have properties that return lists (EntitySet) because you don’t want to pass the entire list back when you want to save the entity when you didn’t change anything in the EntitySet."

is he posting any solution to that issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ,<br />
as jon said<br />
&#8220;The biggest challenge is dealing with entities that have properties that return lists (EntitySet) because you don’t want to pass the entire list back when you want to save the entity when you didn’t change anything in the EntitySet.&#8221;</p>
<p>is he posting any solution to that issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Adams</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>David Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>Great tip on the IsNew.  Works like a champ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip on the IsNew.  Works like a champ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3778</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if there is another language or set of commands beside SQL for talking with databases? 

I'm working on a project and am doing some research thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if there is another language or set of commands beside SQL for talking with databases? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on a project and am doing some research thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3776</guid>
		<description>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. 

Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3363</guid>
		<description>Hey Jon, nice post. I just wanted to add that Linq checks optimistic concurrency on each column by default using the column's Update Check property. So you can avoid altering the tables by adding the timestamp column. Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jon, nice post. I just wanted to add that Linq checks optimistic concurrency on each column by default using the column&#8217;s Update Check property. So you can avoid altering the tables by adding the timestamp column. Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Kruger</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>@Fer,

I'm sure you could keep track of changes manually and then compare the version in the database to the original version of your entity (before you made changes to it) but that would probably be really slow and take way longer to implement than adding the timestamps.  I would just bite the bullet and add the timestamps and let LINQ to SQL handle the concurrency checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fer,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you could keep track of changes manually and then compare the version in the database to the original version of your entity (before you made changes to it) but that would probably be really slow and take way longer to implement than adding the timestamps.  I would just bite the bullet and add the timestamps and let LINQ to SQL handle the concurrency checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fer</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>Fer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>I have many tables and is not practical to add a time stamp to each one of them. Isn't there a different way to implement disconected linq entities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have many tables and is not practical to add a time stamp to each one of them. Isn&#8217;t there a different way to implement disconected linq entities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrnon</title>
		<link>http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/comment-page-1/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>mrnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonkruger.com/blog/2008/02/10/linq-to-sql-in-disconnectedn-tier-scenarios-saving-an-object/#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great article. This is what I'm looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article. This is what I&#8217;m looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

